[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130927134802.GA15690@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 15:48:02 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
Jason Low <jason.low2@...com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@...com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Alex Shi <alex.shi@...aro.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr.bueso@...com>,
Matthew R Wilcox <matthew.r.wilcox@...el.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 5/6] MCS Lock: Restructure the MCS lock defines and
locking code into its own file
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 06:44:55AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> It's a CHK test, so it's only tested with --strict
>
> $ scripts/checkpatch.pl -f --strict kernel/mutex.c 2>&1 | grep memory
> CHECK: memory barrier without comment
> CHECK: memory barrier without comment
>
> It could be changed to WARN so it's always on.
Yes please, we can't be too careful with memory barriers.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists