[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130927143442.GE4422@pd.tnic>
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 16:34:42 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: hpa@...or.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
huawei.libin@...wei.com, wangyijing@...wei.com,
fenghua.yu@...el.com, tglx@...utronix.de, guohanjun@...wei.com,
paul.gortmaker@...driver.com, linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] x86, alternatives: Drop ancient lockdep fixup message
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
It messes up the output of the nodes/cores bootup table and it is
obsolete anyway, see
17abecfe651c x86: fix up alternatives with lockdep enabled
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20130927065115.GA6852@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
---
arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c | 11 -----------
1 file changed, 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c b/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
index 15e8563e5c24..df94598ad05a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
@@ -402,17 +402,6 @@ void alternatives_enable_smp(void)
{
struct smp_alt_module *mod;
-#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP
- /*
- * Older binutils section handling bug prevented
- * alternatives-replacement from working reliably.
- *
- * If this still occurs then you should see a hang
- * or crash shortly after this line:
- */
- pr_info("lockdep: fixing up alternatives\n");
-#endif
-
/* Why bother if there are no other CPUs? */
BUG_ON(num_possible_cpus() == 1);
--
1.8.4
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists