[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5245D609.1060809@suse.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 15:01:29 -0400
From: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@...e.com>
To: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Maling List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] blktrace: fix race with open trace files and directory
removal
On 9/27/13 2:56 PM, Jeff Moyer wrote:
> Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@...e.com> writes:
>
>> On 9/27/13 2:43 PM, Jeff Moyer wrote:
>>> Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@...e.com> writes:
>>>
>>>> There's a bug in the blktrace client where it will stop and tear down
>>>> all of the tracing instances for devices it's opened whether it
>>>> successfully completed the setup or not.
>>>>
>>>> By starting multiple blktrace processes on the same device, it's possible
>>>> to permanently disable blktrace on that device. The cause is that when
>>>> the first blktrace process to exit tears down the directory structure,
>>>> the trace files are still held open. Debugfs removes the dentries for the
>>>> open files just fine but the relay implementation doesn't remove the
>>>> dentries until all of the references to the file are dropped. This means
>>>> that if there are open files when debugfs_remove is called for the device
>>>> directory, the directory is not empty and can't be removed. Since the
>>>> shutdown of the blktrace structure xchg's the structure out, there's no
>>>> way to clean up the directory and any new blktrace processes will fail
>>>> to start because it can't create the directory.
>>>>
>>>> This patch adds a kref to blk_trace so that we can release it after the
>>>> initial reference as well as all of the references accumulated by the
>>>> relay files are dropped.
>>>
>>> Can't we just do proper unwinding of errors in the do_blktrace_setup
>>> function? In other words, don't just blindly call blk_trace_free, but
>>> instead just undo anything we've done.
>>
>> No. It's not the setup that's causing the problem. It's one process
>> holding the trace files open while another process calls BLKTRACETEARDOWN.
>
> Ah, right. So, in that case I'd rather restrict the ioctl to just the
> process that setup the trace. Jens, Tejun, any opinions?
We'd also need to check to see if the task that started the trace is
still around.
-Jeff
--
Jeff Mahoney
SUSE Labs
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (842 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists