[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1380318405.27811.37.camel@pasglop>
Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2013 07:46:45 +1000
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Please revert 928bea964827d7824b548c1f8e06eccbbc4d0d7d
On Fri, 2013-09-27 at 10:10 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > So i would like to use the first way that you suggest : call pci_set_master
> > PCIe port driver.
>
> So I have to say, that if we can fix this with just adding a single
> new pci_set_master() call, we should do that before we decide to
> revert.
>
> If other, bigger issues then come up, we can decide to revert. But if
> there's a one-liner fix, let's just do that first, ok?
>
> Mind sending a patch?
Wouldn't it be better to simply have pci_enable_device() always set bus
master on a bridge? I don't see any case where it makes sense to have
an enabled bridge without the master bit set on it...
Cheers,
Ben.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists