Date:	Fri, 27 Sep 2013 16:29:20 -0600
From:	Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@...com>
To:	Zhang Yanfei <zhangyanfei.yes@...il.com>
Cc:	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, lenb@...nel.org,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, mingo@...e.hu,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
	Wanpeng Li <liwanp@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.de>,
	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
	Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...wei.com>,
	Wen Congyang <wency@...fujitsu.com>,
	Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>,
	isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com, izumi.taku@...fujitsu.com,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
	mina86@...a86.com, gong.chen@...ux.intel.com,
	vasilis.liaskovitis@...fitbricks.com, lwoodman@...hat.com,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, jweiner@...hat.com,
	prarit@...hat.com, "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
	imtangchen@...il.com, Zhang Yanfei <zhangyanfei@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/6] memblock: Introduce bottom-up allocation mode

On Wed, 2013-09-25 at 02:27 +0800, Zhang Yanfei wrote:
> From: Tang Chen <tangchen@...fujitsu.com>
> 
> The Linux kernel cannot migrate pages used by the kernel. As a result, kernel
> pages cannot be hot-removed. So we cannot allocate hotpluggable memory for
> the kernel.
> 
> ACPI SRAT (System Resource Affinity Table) contains the memory hotplug info.
> But before SRAT is parsed, memblock has already started to allocate memory
> for the kernel. So we need to prevent memblock from doing this.
> 
> In a memory hotplug system, any numa node the kernel resides in should
> be unhotpluggable. And for a modern server, each node could have at least
> 16GB memory. So memory around the kernel image is highly likely unhotpluggable.
> 
> So the basic idea is: Allocate memory from the end of the kernel image and
> to the higher memory. Since memory allocation before SRAT is parsed won't
> be too much, it could highly likely be in the same node with kernel image.
> 
> The current memblock can only allocate memory top-down. So this patch introduces
> a new bottom-up allocation mode to allocate memory bottom-up. And later
> when we use this allocation direction to allocate memory, we will limit
> the start address above the kernel.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tang Chen <tangchen@...fujitsu.com>
> Signed-off-by: Zhang Yanfei <zhangyanfei@...fujitsu.com>

 :

>  /**
> + * __memblock_find_range - find free area utility
> + * @start: start of candidate range
> + * @end: end of candidate range, can be %MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_{ANYWHERE|ACCESSIBLE}
> + * @size: size of free area to find
> + * @align: alignment of free area to find
> + * @nid: nid of the free area to find, %MAX_NUMNODES for any node
> + *
> + * Utility called from memblock_find_in_range_node(), find free area bottom-up.
> + *
> + * RETURNS:
> + * Found address on success, 0 on failure.
> + */
> +static phys_addr_t __init_memblock
> +__memblock_find_range(phys_addr_t start, phys_addr_t end, phys_addr_t size,

Similarly, how about name this function as
__memblock_find_range_bottom_up()?


> +		      phys_addr_t align, int nid)
> +{
> +	phys_addr_t this_start, this_end, cand;
> +	u64 i;
> +
> +	for_each_free_mem_range(i, nid, &this_start, &this_end, NULL) {
> +		this_start = clamp(this_start, start, end);
> +		this_end = clamp(this_end, start, end);
> +
> +		cand = round_up(this_start, align);
> +		if (cand < this_end && this_end - cand >= size)
> +			return cand;
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/**
>   * __memblock_find_range_rev - find free area utility, in reverse order
>   * @start: start of candidate range
>   * @end: end of candidate range, can be %MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_{ANYWHERE|ACCESSIBLE}
> @@ -93,7 +128,7 @@ static long __init_memblock memblock_overlaps_region(struct memblock_type *type,
>   * Utility called from memblock_find_in_range_node(), find free area top-down.
>   *
>   * RETURNS:
> - * Found address on success, %0 on failure.
> + * Found address on success, 0 on failure.
>   */
>  static phys_addr_t __init_memblock
>  __memblock_find_range_rev(phys_addr_t start, phys_addr_t end,
> @@ -127,13 +162,24 @@ __memblock_find_range_rev(phys_addr_t start, phys_addr_t end,
>   *
>   * Find @size free area aligned to @align in the specified range and node.
>   *
> + * When allocation direction is bottom-up, the @start should be greater
> + * than the end of the kernel image. Otherwise, it will be trimmed. The
> + * reason is that we want the bottom-up allocation just near the kernel
> + * image so it is highly likely that the allocated memory and the kernel
> + * will reside in the same node.
> + *
> + * If bottom-up allocation failed, will try to allocate memory top-down.
> + *
>   * RETURNS:
> - * Found address on success, %0 on failure.
> + * Found address on success, 0 on failure.
>   */
>  phys_addr_t __init_memblock memblock_find_in_range_node(phys_addr_t start,
>  					phys_addr_t end, phys_addr_t size,
>  					phys_addr_t align, int nid)
>  {
> +	int ret;
> +	phys_addr_t kernel_end;
> +
>  	/* pump up @end */
>  	if (end == MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ACCESSIBLE)
>  		end = memblock.current_limit;
> @@ -141,6 +187,37 @@ phys_addr_t __init_memblock memblock_find_in_range_node(phys_addr_t start,
>  	/* avoid allocating the first page */
>  	start = max_t(phys_addr_t, start, PAGE_SIZE);
>  	end = max(start, end);
> +	kernel_end = __pa_symbol(_end);

Please address the issue in __pa_symbol() that Andrew pointed out.

Thanks,
-Toshi

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists