[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130928210111.GZ21253@outflux.net>
Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2013 14:01:11 -0700
From: Kees Cook <kees@...flux.net>
To: Wolfram Gloger <wg@...loc.de>
Cc: dvyukov@...gle.com, ak@...ux.intel.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, pjt@...gle.com,
andreyknvl@...gle.com, kcc@...gle.com, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: Out-of-bounds access in get_wchan (arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c)
On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 09:51:14PM +0200, Wolfram Gloger wrote:
> Kees Cook <kees@...flux.net> writes:
>
> > Please note that these bounds checks aren't correct to begin with. Since
> > a pointer is being dereferenced, the end boundry must be reduced by
> > sizeof(unsigned long) as well.
> >
> > It looks like process_32.c suffers the same problems, too.
>
> I can't see the end boundary problem in process_32.c. The end checks
> are properly reduced with the top_esp and top_ebp macros.
>
> All I can see in process_32.c is that the check
>
> if (bp < stack_page || bp > top_ebp+stack_page)
>
> could be replaced by:
>
> if (bp < stack_page-sizeof(unsigned long) || bp > top_ebp+stack_page)
>
> but that is a relaxation and not an over/underrun fix.
>
> Can you elaborate what problem you see in process_32.c?
Ah, yes, sorry, this appears to only be a problem in process_64.c. I didn't look
closely enough. I see now that top_esp and top_ebp correctly reduce the size of
THREAD_SIZE. Thanks!
-Kees
--
Kees Cook @outflux.net
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists