[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52466624.4040106@ispras.ru>
Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2013 01:16:20 -0400
From: Alexey Khoroshilov <khoroshilov@...ras.ru>
To: Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
CC: Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@...glemail.com>,
"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
ldv-project@...uxtesting.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] carl9170: fix leaks at failure path in carl9170_usb_probe()
On 28.09.2013 00:17, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 12:51 AM, Alexey Khoroshilov
> <khoroshilov@...ras.ru> wrote:
>
>> - return request_firmware_nowait(THIS_MODULE, 1, CARL9170FW_NAME,
>> + err = request_firmware_nowait(THIS_MODULE, 1, CARL9170FW_NAME,
>> &ar->udev->dev, GFP_KERNEL, ar, carl9170_usb_firmware_step2);
>> + if (err) {
>> + usb_put_dev(udev);
>> + usb_put_dev(udev);
> You are doing the same free twice.
Yes, because it was get twice.
> I guess you meant to also free: usb_put_dev(ar->udev)
udev and ar->udev are equal, so technically the patch is correct.
I agree that there is some inconsistency, but I would prefer to fix it
at usb_get_dev() side with a comment about reasons for the double get.
--
Alexey
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists