linux-kernel - Re: [ 00/71] 3.11.3-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130930015119.GD13344@kroah.com>
Date:	Sun, 29 Sep 2013 18:51:19 -0700
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [ 00/71] 3.11.3-stable review

On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 06:28:51PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 09/29/2013 12:27 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.11.3 release.
> > There are 71 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Tue Oct  1 19:26:27 UTC 2013.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > 	kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.11.3-rc1.gz
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> >
> 
> Build test results:
> 	total: 110 pass: 108 skipped: 2 fail: 0
> 
> Same as with 3.11.2.

Thanks for testing.  Any chance we can ever get those two skipped ones
fixed.  It feels odd that 3.10 passes those and 3.11 doesn't

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/