linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv2 0/9] omap hwspinlock dt support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1309300309530.17980@utopia.booyaka.com>
Date:	Mon, 30 Sep 2013 03:12:36 +0000 (UTC)
From:	Paul Walmsley <paul@...an.com>
To:	Suman Anna <s-anna@...com>
cc:	Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>,
	Benoit Cousson <bcousson@...libre.com>,
	Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 0/9] omap hwspinlock dt support

Hi

On Fri, 27 Sep 2013, Suman Anna wrote:

> Paul,
> The hwmod data patches needs to be merged only after the respective DT
> node patches are merged, without which the hwmod entry will not have a
> base address while enabling and idling (using sysc) the hwmod during
> hwmod initialization.

Hmm, ideally there shouldn't be a merge dependency here. Could you please 
send a patch to the hwmod core that logs a warning and skips the operation 
in these circumstances?  Or maybe just skips the registration of the 
device?


- Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/