[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130930173627.GF10293@ghostprotocols.net>
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 14:36:27 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf auto-dep: Speed up feature tests by building them
in parallel
Em Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 02:30:52PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> Em Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 02:27:41PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> > Em Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 02:12:20PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> > > Em Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 06:42:10PM +0200, Ingo Molnar escreveu:
> > > > This series (with combo patch attached) implements (much) faster
> > > > perf-tools feature-auto-detection.
> Removed python-devel and it correctly turned those off:
>
> ... libpython: [ OFF ]
> ... libpython-version: [ OFF ]
>
> One possible way to speed this up a bit more would be to somehow state that if
> the test A fails, then don't even bother testing test B, like in the case above.
Another suggestion: To provide a short sentence with each feature
stating what will be not present when something is "OFF", or even a
sentence stating what the feature is about, so the user get a better
picture of what is (not) being built into his tool.
Probably reusing strings we already have in the makefiles.
- Arnaldo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists