[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130930181411.GO15690@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 20:14:11 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@...com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr.bueso@...com>,
Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Matthew R Wilcox <matthew.r.wilcox@...el.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
"Chandramouleeswaran, Aswin" <aswin@...com>,
"Norton, Scott J" <scott.norton@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH, v2] anon_vmas: Convert the rwsem to an rwlock_t
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 10:10:27AM -0700, Tim Chen wrote:
> Here's the exim workload data:
>
> rwsem improvment:
> Waimain's patch: +2.0%
> Alex+Tim's patchset: +4.8%
> Waiman+Alex+Tim: +5.3%
>
> convert rwsem to rwlock_t for root anon_vma lock
> Ingo's patch +11.7%
>
What happens if you stuff Waiman's qrwlock patches on top of that?
admittedly and oft mentioned in this thread, our current rwlock_t is
somewhat suboptimal under a number of conditions.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists