[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFw6tOVMw=pKE_knj4BOwTi_JAX=4N=-5_WduykNPotdww@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 13:04:34 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Waiman Long <waiman.long@...com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
"Chandramouleeswaran, Aswin" <aswin@...com>,
"Norton, Scott J" <scott.norton@...com>,
George Spelvin <linux@...izon.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
ppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: Avoiding the dentry d_lock on final dput(), part deux:
transactional memory
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 1:01 PM, Waiman Long <waiman.long@...com> wrote:
>
> I think this patch is worth a trial if relevant hardware is more widely
> available. The TSX code certainly need to be moved to an architecture
> specific area and should be runtime enabled using a static key. We also need
> more TSX support infrastructure in place first.
I think we can pick that up from Andi's patches, he should have that.
Although that did have very x86-specific naming (ie "xbegin"). And I
don't think he used "asm goto" to quite the same advantage as this -
and I think we do want to make sure that the overhead is minimal.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists