[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130930235306.GB13399@verge.net.au>
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2013 08:53:06 +0900
From: Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
To: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@....de>
Cc: Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] ARM: shmobile: CPUFreq support on Lager
Hi Guennadi,
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 05:25:42PM +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> Just a quick check of the status of this patch series:
>
> On Thu, 26 Sep 2013, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
>
> > On Lager a da9210 regulator is used to supply DVFS power to the SoC. This
> > patch series adds I2C and Z-clock support on r8a7790 and CPUFreq support
> > for the Lager board. Please note, that patch 4/4 is an RFC as explained
> > inline.
> >
> > Developed on top of today's
> >
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/horms/renesas.git devel
> >
> > plus i2c-rcar patches from my earlier patch series
> >
> > [PATCH v2 0/5] i2c: rcar: Device Tree support and clock improvements
> >
> > and the "sh-pfc: r8a7790: Add I2C pin groups and functions" patch from
> > Ulrich Hecht.
> >
> > All changes since v1 are noted in respective patches. They all are trivial,
> > still as soon as test hardware is available, it would be good to run-time
> > test this version too.
> >
> > Cc: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski+renesas@...il.com>
> >
> > Guennadi Liakhovetski (5):
> > pinctrl: sh-pfc: r8a7790: add pin definitions for the I2C3 interface
>
> Laurent has taken this one.
>
> > ARM: shmobile: r8a7790: add I2C clocks and aliases for the DT mode
> > ARM: shmobile: r8a7790: add I2C DT nodes
>
> You've applied the above two too, thanks.
>
> > ARM: shmobile: r8a7790: add CPUFreq clock support
>
> Do I see it right, that you're waiting for a review for the above one?
Yes, sorry for not being clearer.
I would like a review of this.
> > ARM: shmobile: lager: (DEVEL) add CPUFreq support
>
> Once a review of #4/5 is posted, I can split the above patch into two to
> separate shmobile and DT parts, as requested by Sergei. Is that about what
> you're expecting too?
Again, sorry for not being clearer. Yes, I agree with Sergei.
I would like the patch split into a DT patch and a board patch.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists