lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANqRtoSwYgTHSzrrYNULajn45gsSJw9ST7rb=WGiHiLDsQLSTQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 1 Oct 2013 18:30:42 +0900
From:	Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>
To:	takasi-y@....dti.ne.jp
Cc:	SH-Linux <linux-sh@...r.kernel.org>,
	Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@...ethink.co.uk>,
	Shinya Kuribayashi <shinya.kuribayashi.px@...esas.com>,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
	Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>,
	Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
	Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] sh: clkfwk: Select sh-/common- clkfwk alternatively

On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 1:12 PM,  <takasi-y@....dti.ne.jp> wrote:
> Make sh clock framework core depend on HAVE_MACH_CLKDEV, and
> set it
> - y on sh for backward compatibility
> - !CONFIG_COMMON_CLK on sh-mobile
> This is a preparation for migration to common clock framework
> from sh clock framework on sh-mobile.
>
> Signed-off-by: Takashi Yoshii <takashi.yoshii.zj@...esas.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/Kconfig        | 2 +-
>  arch/sh/Kconfig         | 1 +
>  drivers/sh/clk/Makefile | 3 +--
>  3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Hi Yoshii-san,

Thanks for your patch. I'm sure there is a reason behind this, but I'm
trying to understand why you need this modification. It looks to me
like you're trying to enable COMMON_CLK on ARCH_SHMOBILE but in my
mind it is enough to only enable COMMON_CLK in the case of
ARCH_SHMOBILE_MULTI.

During my test using ARCH_SHMOBILE_MULTI on KZM9D I omitted this patch
and only used patch 1, 2, 4, 5, and a modified 6 from your series.
This worked just fine, but I may be missing something.

Let me know if you really want to keep this patch or not. If it's not
needed for MULTIPLATFORM then I suggest that we just drop it.

Cheers,

/ magnus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ