linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 00/12] Introduce common infra for tegra clocks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 01 Oct 2013 11:39:09 -0600
From:	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
To:	Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>
CC:	Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
	Prashant Gaikwad <pgaikwad@...dia.com>,
	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...onic-design.de>,
	Joseph Lo <josephl@...dia.com>,
	Paul Walmsley <pwalmsley@...dia.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/12] Introduce common infra for tegra clocks

On 09/23/2013 08:24 AM, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
> This patchset introduces common infrastructure for clocks which exist in
> several Tegra SoCs. We also move Tegra114 to this new infrastructure.
> Tegra20 and Tegra30 will be moved later in separate patchsets.
> 
> Changes since v1:
> + move common clks allocation to patch 2
> + adapt also Tegra20 and Tegra30 to the changes in patch 2
> 
> Boottested on dalmore, beaverboard and seaboard.

What commit is this series based on? I applied the two pre-requisites:

ARM: tegra114: add missing clocks to binding.eml
clk: tegra: replace enum tegra114_clk by binding header.eml

... but still got a bunch of conflicts when applying this. I guess at
least commit 819c1de "clk: add CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT flag" isn't in
the history of this series. Consequently, I gave up and didn't test this.

Also, I had given a lot of feedback on v1. Admittedly I should have
reviewed v2 since it appeared just before I reviewed v1, but I expect
most of the feedback still applies given the limited list of changes
listed above. Certainly, this series still removes the "dsib" clock yet
I expect it shouldn't (patch 1, in the change to
tegra114_periph_clk_init()), and that's the very first piece of feedback
I gave on v1, and also causes the first "git am" conflict with
CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/