lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 1 Oct 2013 13:27:56 -0700
From:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Tibor Billes <tbilles@....com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Unusually high system CPU usage with recent kernels

On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 03:59:51PM +0200, Tibor Billes wrote:
> > From: Paul E. McKenney Sent: 09/13/13 02:19 AM
> > On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 08:46:04AM +0200, Tibor Billes wrote:
> > > > From: Paul E. McKenney Sent: 09/09/13 10:44 PM

[ . . . ]

> > > Sure. The attached tar file contains traces of good kernels. The first is with
> > > version 3.9.7 (no patch applied) which was the last stable kernel I tried and
> > > didn't have this issue. The second is version 3.11 with your fix applied.
> > > Judging by the size of the traces, 3.11.0+ is still doing more work than
> > > 3.9.7.
> > 
> > Indeed, though quite a bit less than the problematic traces.
> > 
> > Did you have all three patches applied to 3.11.0, or just the last one?
> > If the latter, could you please try it with all three?
> 
> Only the last one was applied to 3.11.0. The attachement now contains the
> RCU trace with all thee applied. It seems to be smaller in size, but still
> not close to 3.9.7.
> 
> > > > > I'm not sure about LKML policies about attaching not-so-small files to
> > > > > emails, so I've dropped LKML from the CC list. Please CC the mailing
> > > > > list in your reply.
> > > > 
> > > > Done!
> > > > 
> > > > Another approach is to post the traces on the web and send the URL to
> > > > LKML. But whatever works for you is fine by me.
> > > 
> > > Sending directly to you won again :) Could you please CC the list in your
> > > reply?
> > 
> > Done! ;-)
> 
> Could you please CC the list in your reply again? :)

This trace is quite strange -- there are a number of processes that sleep
and then wake up almost immediately, as in within a microsecond or so.
I don't know why they would be doing that, and I also cannot think of
what RCU might be doing to make them do that.

I am unfortunately out of ideas on this one.

							Thanx, Paul

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ