linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] [workqueue] check values of pwq and wq in print_worker

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 1 Oct 2013 17:03:48 -0400
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	Helge Deller <deller@....de>
Cc:	Libin <huawei.libin@...wei.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org,
	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [workqueue] check values of pwq and wq in
 print_worker_info() before use

On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 10:53:31PM +0200, Helge Deller wrote:
> So, in summary my patch here is not really necessary, but for the sake of
> clean code I think it doesn't hurt either and as such it would be nice if
> you could apply it.

What? function *must* take any value and try to access it and not
cause failure.  That's the *whole* purpose of that interface.  How is
having incomplete spurious checks around it "clean code" in any sense
of the word?  That doesn't make any sense.

 Nacked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>

and *please* don't add any checks like that anywhere else in the
kernel.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/