[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131001071646.GA20023@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2013 09:16:46 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@....com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
Sonny Rao <sonnyrao@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf session: Fix infinite loop on invalid perf.data file
* Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org> wrote:
> --- a/tools/perf/util/header.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/header.c
> @@ -2753,6 +2753,15 @@ int perf_session__read_header(struct perf_session *session)
> if (perf_file_header__read(&f_header, header, fd) < 0)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> + /*
> + * Sanity check that perf.data was written cleanly; data size is
> + * initialized to 0 and updated only if the on_exit function is run.
> + * If data size is still 0 then the file contains only partial
> + * information. Just warn user and process it as much as it can.
> + */
> + if (f_header.data.size == 0)
> + pr_warning("Data size is 0. Was the record command properly terminated?\n");
Just a detail: it would be nice to make all the user facing messages in
tools/perf/util/header.c more specific and more structured. For example
prefixing it with 'perf header:' would be fine:
WARNING: perf/header: Data size is 0. Was the 'perf record' command properly terminated?
or something like that.
etc.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists