[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131001084853.GH21793@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2013 10:48:53 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@...il.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf tool: don't print bogus data on -e cycles
* Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@...il.com> wrote:
> When only the cycles event is requested:
>
> $ perf stat -e cycles dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/null count=1000000
> 1000000+0 records in
> 1000000+0 records out
> 512000000 bytes (512 MB) copied, 0.26123 s, 2.0 GB/s
>
> Performance counter stats for 'dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/null count=1000000':
>
> 911,626,453 cycles # 0.000 GHz
>
> 0.262113350 seconds time elapsed
>
> The 0.000 GHz comment in the output is totally bogus and misleading. It
> happens because update_shadow_stats() doesn't touch runtime_nsecs_stats;
> it is only written when a requested counter matches a SW_TASK_CLOCK. In
> our case, since we have only requested HW_CPU_CYCLES,
> runtime_nsecs_stats is unavailable. So, omit printing the comment
> altogether.
>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>
> Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@...il.com>
> ---
> tools/perf/builtin-stat.c | 9 ++++-----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists