linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -v2] EFI: Runtime services virtual mapping

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 2 Oct 2013 12:04:26 +0200
From:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc:	Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
	Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org>,
	Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
	Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2] EFI: Runtime services virtual mapping

On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 08:06:38PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Okay... I see two problems.
> 
> 1. It looks like we subtract the region size after, rather than before, assigning an address.
> 

Ok, so I'm looking at this agan and, actually, we really do subtract the
region size *before* we assign the address:

---
       efi_va -= size;
       if (efi_va < EFI_VA_END) {
               pr_warning(FW_WARN "VA address range overflow!\n");
               return;
       }

       /*
        * Make sure the 1:1 mappings are present as a catch-all for b0rked
        * firmware which doesn't update all internal pointers after switching
        * to virtual mode and would otherwise crap on us.
        */
       __map_region(md, md->phys_addr);

       /* Do the VA map */
       __map_region(md, efi_va);
       md->virt_addr = efi_va;
--

So let me give an example why I think it is correct to subtract *before*
assigning and so that we can talk about it and we completely agree on
the details. :-)

When we start allocating from -4G, i.e. 0xffffffff00000000, I think we
want to do it bottom-up so that 0xffffffff00000000 is the *last*, i.e.
lowest address. Because we link the kernel text at 0xffffffff81000000 by
default, which would mean, if -4G was the first address, we'll have only
2G:

0xffffffff81000000 - 0xffffffff00000000 = 0x0000000081000000 = 2.164.260.864 bytes

of space for UEFI mappings.

That's why, I need to *first* subtract and *then* use the resulting
address to map the region to. Like so (4 hypothetical regions):

1st region: 0xfffffffeffffe000 - 0xffffffff00000000

2nd region: 0xfffffffeffff8000 - 0xfffffffeffffe000

3rd region: 0xfffffffefffec000 - 0xfffffffeffff8000

4th region: 0xfffffffefffd8000 - 0xfffffffefffec000

and so on...

IOW, the VA layout looks like this:

0xfffffffefffd8000
...
region 4
...
0xfffffffefffec000 (non including)
...
region 3
...
0xfffffffeffff8000 (ditto)
...
region 2
...
0xfffffffeffffe000 (ditto)
...
region 1
...
0xffffffff00000000 (ditto)

Am I even making sense here?

Thanks.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/