[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131002101137.GB24445@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2013 12:11:37 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf auto-dep: Speed up feature tests by building them
in parallel
* Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com> wrote:
> > @@ -388,7 +410,7 @@ else
> > has_cplus_demangle := $(call try-cc,$(SOURCE_CPLUS_DEMANGLE),$(FLAGS_CPLUS_DEMANGLE),demangle)
> > ifeq ($(has_cplus_demangle),y)
> > EXTLIBS += -liberty
> > - CFLAGS += -DHAVE_CPLUS_DEMANGLE
> > + CFLAGS += -DHAVE_CPLUS_DEMANGLE_SUPPORT
> > else
> > msg := $(warning No bfd.h/libbfd found, install binutils-dev[el]/zlib-static to gain symbol demangling)
> > CFLAGS += -DNO_DEMANGLE
> > @@ -400,30 +422,29 @@ else
> > endif
>
> Why not add tests for
> has_bfd_iberty/has_bfd_iberty_z/has_cplus_demangle?
Yeah, did not get to that stage yet: I only converted the feature tests
that trigger on my system (which is about 80% of them). Will complete the
transition.
> We could remove the config/feature-tests.mak completely and other
> cleanup like remove try-cc.
Yeah - that will be a nice simplification!
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists