linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] drivers: misc: add gpio wakeup driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20131002105723.GA27287@sirena.org.uk>
Date:	Wed, 2 Oct 2013 11:57:23 +0100
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	Daniel Mack <zonque@...il.com>
Cc:	Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers: misc: add gpio wakeup driver

On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 04:05:07PM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote:
> On 01.10.2013 16:01, Fabio Estevam wrote:

> > Isn't it the same as the existing 'gpio-key,wakeup' ?

> Of course, I know the gpio-input driver can provide similar
> functionality. My intention was just provide a way to wake up the system
> without registering an input device for signals nobody is interested in
> eventually.

> Don't know if that's reason enough to add a new driver though.

It does seem somewhat sensible - the signal might not have a sensible
representation as an input device and the gpio-keys binding needs one.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)