[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABPqkBQyCfz5d+SQxDwPD5m52ofE6y5HKur+s-F0s=hN00cxkw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2013 14:59:32 +0200
From: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"mingo@...e.hu" <mingo@...e.hu>,
"ak@...ux.intel.com" <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] perf: mmap2 not covering VM_CLONE regions
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 2:46 PM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 02:39:53PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> - then there are timing attacks, and someone having access to a PMU
>> context and who can trigger this SHA1 computation arbitrarily in task
>> local context can run very accurate and low noise timing attacks...
>>
>> I don't think the kernel's sha_transform() is hardened against timing
>> attacks, it's performance optimized so it has variable execution time
>> highly dependent on plaintext input - which leaks information about the
>> plaintext.
>
> Typical user doesn't have enough priv to profile kernel space; once you
> do you also have enough priv to see kernel addresses outright (ie.
> kallsyms etc..).
>
I was going to say just that. But that's not the default, paranoid level
is at 1 by default and not 2. So I supposedly can still do:
$ perf record -e cycles ......
In per-thread mode and collect kernel level addresses.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists