linux-kernel - Re: [BUG] perf timechart segfault

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 2 Oct 2013 15:26:31 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To:	Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@...il.com>
Cc:	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>
Subject: Re: [BUG] perf timechart segfault


* Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@...il.com> wrote:

> Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > looks like you're missing this one:
> > (git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/acme/linux perf/core)
> 
> Very messy; doesn't rebase on top of the latest torvalds/linux.git 
> cleanly: I get a merge conflict at patch 9 of 74. Since my work is based 
> on torvalds/linux.git, I was hoping to rebase it on top of Arnaldo's 
> tree, but that results in conflicts too: I'm resolving them now.
> 
> Are the merge windows always this large? Why isn't Arnaldo's tree listed 
> in MAINTAINERS?

note that it's Arnaldo's development tree, not a tree to generally base 
pull requests on - that is what tip:perf/core is for.

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/