linux-kernel - Re: RFC: (re-)binding the VFIO platform driver to a platform device

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20131002151413.GG63102@lvm>
Date:	Wed, 2 Oct 2013 16:14:13 +0100
From:	Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@...aro.org>
To:	Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
Cc:	Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@...aro.org>, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, a.motakis@...tualopensystems.com,
	agraf@...e.de, stuart.yoder@...escale.com, B07421@...escale.com,
	B16395@...escale.com, R65777@...escale.com,
	peter.maydell@...aro.org, santosh.shukla@...aro.org,
	kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RFC: (re-)binding the VFIO platform driver to a platform device

On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 08:35:56PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-10-02 at 02:53 +0100, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 05:02:44PM -0500, Kim Phillips wrote:
> > > On Tue, 1 Oct 2013 13:00:54 -0700
> > > Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 01:38:31PM -0500, Kim Phillips wrote:
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > > 
> > > > > Santosh and I are having a problem figuring out how to enable binding
> > > > > (and re-binding) platform devices to a platform VFIO driver (see
> > > > > Antonis' WIP: [1]) in an upstream-acceptable manner.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Binding platform drivers currently depends on a string match in the
> > > > > device node's compatible entry.  On an arndale, one can currently
> > > > > rebind the same device to the same driver like so:
> > > > > 
> > > > > echo 12ce0000.i2c > /sys/bus/platform/drivers/s3c-i2c/12ce0000.i2c/driver/unbind
> > > > > echo 12ce0000.i2c > /sys/bus/platform/drivers/s3c-i2c/bind
> > > > > 
> > > > > And one can bind it to the vfio-dt driver, as Antonis instructs, by
> > > > > appending a 'vfio-dt' string to the device tree compatible entry for
> > > > > the device.  Then this would work:
> > > > > 
> > > > > echo 12ce0000.i2c > /sys/bus/platform/drivers/s3c-i2c/12ce0000.i2c/driver/unbind
> > > > > echo 12ce0000.i2c > /sys/bus/platform/drivers/vfio-dt/bind
> > > > > 
> > > > > Consequently, the hack patch below [2] allows any platform device to be
> > > > > bound to the vfio-dt driver, without making changes to the device
> > > > > tree.  It's a hack because I don't see having any driver name specific
> > > > > code in drivers/base/bus.c being upstream acceptable.
> > > > 
> > > > You are correct.
> > > > 
> > > > What is wrong with just doing the above unbind/bind things through
> > > > sysfs, that is what it is there for, right?
> > > 
> > > The bind fails because the compatible string in the device tree doesn't
> > > match that of the VFIO platform driver, so driver_match_device always
> > > returns false.
> > > 
> > It sounds like this is not going to be pretty almost no matter what
> > we'll end up doing: Inherently VFIO is going to bind to a device without
> > the device tree entry for that device ever saying anything about VFIO.
> > 
> > How is this solved for PCI?  Can we use some analogy from that work to
> > construct the missing piece?
> 
> PCI supports a dynamic ID table for driver/device matching, see
> pci_add_dynid().  The problem is that this gets a little sloppy for the
> period where you have multiple drivers that can claim the same device,
> especially in the presence of hotplug.  Thus the desire to improve the
> situation with some kind of direct binding interface.  Thanks,
> 
So that's called on the vfio pci driver?

Wouldn't a sysfs file to add compatibility strings to the vfio-platform
driver make driver_match_device return true and make everyone happy?

There would be an issue of binding priority to solve, I guess similar to
the PCI problem, but then at least the two device types would share a
common orthogonal challenge.

-Christoffer


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/