[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1380729996.2081.59.camel@joe-AO722>
Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2013 09:06:36 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, monstr@...str.eu,
Alan Tull <atull@...era.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@...era.com>,
Philip Balister <philip@...ister.org>,
Alessandro Rubini <rubini@...dd.com>,
Steffen Trumtrar <s.trumtrar@...gutronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Yves Vandervennet <rocket.yvanderv@...il.com>,
Kyle Teske <kyle.teske@...com>,
Josh Cartwright <joshc@....teric.us>,
Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@...sung.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Cesar Eduardo Barros <cesarb@...arb.net>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
David Brown <davidb@...eaurora.org>,
Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
Nicolas Pitre <nico@...aro.org>,
Mark Langsdorf <mark.langsdorf@...xeda.com>,
Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2] fpga: Introduce new fpga subsystem
On Wed, 2013-10-02 at 17:35 +0200, Michal Simek wrote:
> This new fpga subsystem core should unify all fpga drivers/managers which
> do the same things. Load configuration data to fpga or another programmable
> logic through common interface. It doesn't matter if it is MMIO device,
> gpio bitbanging, etc. connection. The point is to have the same
> interface for these drivers.
Does this interface support partial reprogramming/configuration
for FPGAs that can do that?
trivial notes:
There are a _lot_ of dev_dbg statements.
I hope some of these would be removed one day,
especially the function tracing style ones, because
there's already a generic kernel mechanism for that.
Maybe perf/trace support could be added eventually.
> diff --git a/drivers/fpga/fpga-mgr.c b/drivers/fpga/fpga-mgr.c
[]
> +/**
> + * fpga_mgr_status_write - Write fpga manager status
> + * @dev: Pointer to the device structure
> + * @attr: Pointer to the device attribute structure
> + * @buf: Pointer to the buffer location
> + * @count: Number of characters in @buf
> + *
> + * Returns the number of bytes copied to @buf, a negative error number otherwise
> + */
> +static ssize_t fpga_mgr_status_write(struct device *dev,
> + struct device_attribute *attr,
> + const char *buf, size_t count)
> +{
> + struct fpga_manager *mgr = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (test_and_set_bit_lock(FPGA_MGR_DEV_BUSY, &mgr->flags))
> + return -EBUSY;
> +
> + ret = strcmp(buf, "write_init");
> + if (!ret) {
> + ret = fpga_mgr_write_init(mgr);
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + ret = strcmp(buf, "write_complete");
> + if (!ret) {
> + ret = fpga_mgr_write_complete(mgr);
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + ret = strcmp(buf, "read_init");
> + if (!ret) {
> + ret = fpga_mgr_read_init(mgr);
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + ret = strcmp(buf, "read_complete");
> + if (!ret) {
> + ret = fpga_mgr_read_complete(mgr);
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> +out:
> + clear_bit_unlock(FPGA_MGR_DEV_BUSY, &mgr->flags);
> +
> + return ret ? : count;
> +}
I think this style is awkward and this would be
better written as:
if (!strcmp(buf, "write_init"))
ret = fpga_mgr_write_init(mgr);
else if (!strcmp(buf, "write_complete"))
ret = fpga_mgr_write_complete(mgr);
else if (!strcmp(buf, "read_init"))
ret = fpga_mgr_read_init(mgr);
else if (!strcmp(buf, "read_complete"))
ret = fpga_mgr_read_complete(mgr);
else
ret = -EINVAL;
clear_bit_unlock(FPGA_MGR_DEV_BUSY, &mgr->flags);
if (ret)
return ret;
return count;
}
Maybe use (strcmp(...) == 0) if you prefer that.
Both styles are commonly used in linux.
Probably all of the "return ret ?: count;" uses
would be more easily understood on 3 lines.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists