[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131002161436.GN2920@ghostprotocols.net>
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2013 13:14:36 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>
To: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...il.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [BUG] perf tests: Test converting perf time to TSC
Em Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 04:46:59PM +0300, Adrian Hunter escreveu:
> On 02/10/13 16:23, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > hi,
> > got a segfault in the tsc test on latest acme's tree.
> >
> > I'm dealing with some other issues right now, so just reporting ;-)
>
> The capability bits have changed positions. You need to have:
>
> commit fa7315871046b9a4c48627905691dbde57e51033
> Author: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> Date: Thu Sep 19 10:16:42 2013 +0200
>
> perf: Fix capabilities bitfield compatibility in 'struct
> perf_event_mmap_page'
>
> in both (or neither) of your kernel and perf tools.
Yeah, I'll merge perf/urgent into acme/perf/core soon.
- Arnaldo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists