linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] slub: Proper kmemleak tracking if CONFIG_SLUB

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <0000014179fc82ac-8e47c69d-8c5a-4f75-957d-15741eb36eda-000000@email.amazonses.com>
Date:	Wed, 2 Oct 2013 16:24:53 +0000
From:	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
To:	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
cc:	"Bird, Tim" <Tim.Bird@...ymobile.com>,
	Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
	Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>,
	"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Bobniev, Roman" <Roman.Bobniev@...ymobile.com>,
	Andersson, Björn 
	<Bjorn.Andersson@...ymobile.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] slub: Proper kmemleak tracking if CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG
 disabled

On Wed, 2 Oct 2013, Catalin Marinas wrote:

> Kmemleak doesn't depend on SLUB_DEBUG (at least it didn't originally ;),
> so I don't think we should add an artificial dependency (or select). Can
> we have kmemleak_*() calls in both debug and !debug hooks?

Yes if you move the hook calls out from under CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/