linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] perf stat: Set child_pid after perf_evlist__prepare

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <878uycnztj.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com>
Date:	Wed, 02 Oct 2013 11:58:48 +0900
From:	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>
Cc:	David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@....com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf stat: Set child_pid after perf_evlist__prepare_workload()

On Tue, 1 Oct 2013 13:51:33 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 07:47:25AM -0600, David Ahern escreveu:
>> On 9/30/13 3:01 AM, Namhyung Kim wrote:
>> >From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@....com>
>> >
>> >The commit acf2892270dc ("perf stat: Use perf_evlist__prepare/
>> >start_workload()") converted to use the function but forgot to update
>> >child_pid.  Fix it.
>> >
>> >Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
>> >Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
>> >Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
>> >---
>> >  tools/perf/builtin-stat.c | 1 +
>> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>> >
>> >diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c b/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c
>> >index f686d5ff594e..5098f144b92d 100644
>> >--- a/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c
>> >+++ b/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c
>> >@@ -457,6 +457,7 @@ static int __run_perf_stat(int argc, const char **argv)
>> >  			perror("failed to prepare workload");
>> >  			return -1;
>> >  		}
>> >+		child_pid = evsel_list->workload.pid;
>> >  	}
>> >
>> >  	if (group)
>> >
>> 
>> Interesting. I can't find a test case where is matters ... perhaps a
>> convenience of waitpid taking -1.
>
> Yeah, the interval part initially used the fork return, then after
> acf2892270dc used the default value of child_pid, -1, which is ok as it
> waits for any children, but I wonder what would happen in workloads with
> multiple children.

Hmm.. right.  And in fact what I actually concern was when killing child
if create_perf_stat_counter() failed.

	if (child_pid != -1)
		kill(child_pid, SIGTERM);

>
> But for correctness acf2892270dc should have kept the existing
> semantics, even if using -1 could in the end be ok.

Agreed.

Thanks,
Namhyung
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/