[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131002164718.GA7392@roeck-us.net>
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2013 09:47:18 -0700
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Henrik Rydberg <rydberg@...omail.se>
Cc: Chris Murphy <bugzilla@...orremedies.com>,
Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...oraproject.org>, khali@...ux-fr.org,
lm-sensors@...sensors.org,
"Linux-Kernel@...r. Kernel. Org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: applesmc oops in 3.10/3.11
On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 06:34:18PM +0200, Henrik Rydberg wrote:
> > >>One thing I have seen in all logs is the earlier "send_byte fail" message, so
> > >>I think that is a pre-requisite.
> > >
> > >Not necessarily - it could be that the patch actually fixes the root
> > >cause. One possible scenario is that on recent SMCs, some of the
> > >commands produce more data than we actually read. This would
> > >eventually lead to both data corruption and overflow somwhere in the
> > >SMC internals. If the original SMC error is interpreted as a read
> > >buffer overflow, then that problem should be fixed with this patch.
> > >
> >
> > Good point.
> >
> > But shouldn't we at least get the "flushed %d bytes" warning message in this case ?
>
> The explanation I have there is that the (newer) SMC needs the
> application to read the 'no more bytes' or it will get confused. It
> makes sense, if the number of bytes to read is no longer specified.
>
You mean that just reading from APPLESMC_CMD_PORT would solve the problem ?
That might make sense.
Thanks,
Guenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists