[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKohpok2iwwhZbAZuawW-Ow4ofbGZpUj6Jn7A-F8C42yQ=rA7Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2013 22:19:18 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc: Jon Medhurst <tixy@...aro.org>,
"cpufreq@...r.kernel.org" <cpufreq@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: make return type of lock_policy_rwsem_{read|write}()
as void
On 2 October 2013 22:08, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
> On Wednesday, October 02, 2013 02:13:36 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> On 30 September 2013 23:58, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
>> > On Monday, September 16, 2013 08:40:17 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> >> lock_policy_rwsem_{read|write}() currently has return type of int but it always
>> >> return zero and hence its return type must be void instead. This patch makes its
>> >> return type void and fixes all users of it as well.
>> >>
>> >> Reported-by: Jon Medhurst<tixy@...aro.org>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
>> >
>> > This doesn't apply to bleeding-edge for me any more after I have applied your
>> > series of 44 patches to it. Care to resend?
>>
>> Done..
>
> Which one is it?
>
[PATCH RESEND 01/11] cpufreq: make return type of
lock_policy_rwsem_{read|write}() as void
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists