linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 10/19] xen: introduce xen_alloc/free_coherent

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20131002170747.GG29794@arm.com>
Date:	Wed, 2 Oct 2013 18:07:48 +0100
From:	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To:	Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>
Cc:	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
	"xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com" <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"Ian.Campbell@...rix.com" <Ian.Campbell@...rix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 10/19] xen: introduce xen_alloc/free_coherent_pages

On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 06:03:46PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Oct 2013, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > On 30 Sep 2013, at 16:31, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com> wrote:
> > > On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 05:09:58PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > >> xen_swiotlb_alloc_coherent needs to allocate a coherent buffer for cpu
> > >> and devices. On native x86 and ARMv8 is sufficient to call
> > >> __get_free_pages in order to get a coherent buffer, while on ARM we need
> > >> to call the native dma_ops->alloc implementation.
> > >> 
> > >> When arm64 stops using the swiotlb by default and starts having multiple
> > >> dma_ops implementations, we'll use __get_dma_ops there too.
> > > 
> > > I presume this is a future TODO, not some further patch (in which
> > > case you should say in here the title of it). If it is a TODO could
> > > you stick that in the sentence here somewhere to make it crytal clear that
> > > it is not implemented.
> > 
> > Thanks for pointing this out.  The arm64 patch shouldn't be different
> > from arm here.  I thought a subsequent patch already added
> > __get_dma_ops() for arm64.
> 
> Yes, the arm64 patch already added __get_dma_ops.
> 
> However I am not using __get_dma_ops to implement
> xen_alloc_coherent_pages for arm64 because I can just use
> __get_free_pages for the moment:

So why do the work twice when we'll get coherency maintenance in the DMA
ops?

-- 
Catalin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/