[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20131002.142509.1450460988268165850.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2013 14:25:09 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: sparclinux@...r.kernel.org
CC: linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] Fix generic hugetlb pte check return type.
The include/asm-generic/hugetlb.h stubs that just vector huge_pte_*()
calls to the pte_*() implementations won't work in certain situations.
x86 and sparc, for example, return "unsigned long" from the bit
checks, and just go "return pte_val(pte) & PTE_BIT_FOO;"
But since huge_pte_*() returns 'int', if any high bits on 64-bit are
relevant, they get chopped off.
The net effect is that we can loop forever trying to COW a huge page,
because the huge_pte_write() check signals false all the time.
Reported-by: Gurudas Pai <gurudas.pai@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
---
Anyone mind if I push this through the sparc tree?
diff --git a/include/asm-generic/hugetlb.h b/include/asm-generic/hugetlb.h
index d06079c..99b490b 100644
--- a/include/asm-generic/hugetlb.h
+++ b/include/asm-generic/hugetlb.h
@@ -6,12 +6,12 @@ static inline pte_t mk_huge_pte(struct page *page, pgprot_t pgprot)
return mk_pte(page, pgprot);
}
-static inline int huge_pte_write(pte_t pte)
+static inline unsigned long huge_pte_write(pte_t pte)
{
return pte_write(pte);
}
-static inline int huge_pte_dirty(pte_t pte)
+static inline unsigned long huge_pte_dirty(pte_t pte)
{
return pte_dirty(pte);
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists