linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] perf auto-dep: Speed up feature tests by building them in parallel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 02 Oct 2013 15:05:17 +0900
From:	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
	David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf auto-dep: Speed up feature tests by building them in parallel

Hi Ingo,

On Mon, 30 Sep 2013 18:42:10 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> This series (with combo patch attached) implements (much) faster 
> perf-tools feature-auto-detection.
>
> I used 3 tricks to implement feature auto-dependencies and to speed up 
> feature detection:
>
>   - standalone Makefile in config/feature-checks/ built in parallel
>
>   - split-out standalone .c files in config/feature-checks/*.c
>
>   - used GCC's auto-dependency generation feature (-MD) to track the
>     effects of system library addition/removal.

I have a memory that this could lead to a nasty build failure.  Please
see the commit b6f4f804108b ("tools lib traceevent: Do not generate
dependency for system header files").

The problem is that it turned out to depend on some compiler headers
which are located under some directory with a version number.  If so,
when compiler upgraded to a new version, it cannot find the original
dependencies so fail to build.

 $ cat config/feature-checks/test-libelf.d
  test-libelf: test-libelf.c /usr/include/libelf.h /usr/include/sys/types.h \
   /usr/include/features.h /usr/include/stdc-predef.h \
   /usr/include/sys/cdefs.h /usr/include/bits/wordsize.h \
   /usr/include/gnu/stubs.h /usr/include/gnu/stubs-64.h \
   /usr/include/bits/types.h /usr/include/bits/typesizes.h \
   /usr/include/time.h \
   /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.7.2/include/stddef.h \
   /usr/include/endian.h /usr/include/bits/endian.h \
   /usr/include/bits/byteswap.h /usr/include/bits/byteswap-16.h \
   /usr/include/sys/select.h /usr/include/bits/select.h \
   /usr/include/bits/sigset.h /usr/include/bits/time.h \
   /usr/include/sys/sysmacros.h /usr/include/bits/pthreadtypes.h \
   /usr/include/elf.h \
   /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.7.2/include/stdint.h \
   /usr/include/stdint.h /usr/include/bits/wchar.h


In this case we are using this for feature-checking, so I guess it'd
fail to check the feature after upgrade.

Thanks,
Namhyung
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/