[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1380695738.2081.33.camel@joe-AO722>
Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2013 23:35:38 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Ryan Mallon <rmallon@...il.com>
Cc: Mathieu Rhéaume <mathieu@...ingrhemes.com>,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, arve@...roid.com,
dan.carpenter@...cle.com, mirsal@...sal.fr,
serban.constantinescu@....com, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Staging : android: binder.c: Prefer seq_puts to
seq_printf
On Wed, 2013-10-02 at 15:15 +1000, Ryan Mallon wrote:
> On 02/10/13 11:57, Mathieu Rhéaume wrote:
> > This patch changes seq_printf for seq_puts in binder.c.
> > It fixes the warnings emitted by checkpatch.pl.
[]
> Umm, this won't compile. seq_puts() is defined as:
>
> int seq_puts(struct seq_file *m, const char *s);
>
> checkpatch.pl does indeed complain about uses of seq_printf() in
> drivers/staging/android/binder.c which are passing formatted strings. At
> a quick glance it looks like checkpatch.pl is only checking for the
> format string on the same line as seq_printf(), so this files ugly
> coding style confuses the check. Joe?
True.
This patch should have fixed it. It's in -next already.
https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/9/13/698
> Anyway, please don't blindly change things in the kernel without at
> least compile testing them.
Yes, please.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists