linux-kernel - [ 10/57] bcache: Fix for handling overlapping extents when reading in a btree node

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20131003040637.309476274@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:	Wed,  2 Oct 2013 21:08:36 -0700
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org, Kent Overstreet <kmo@...erainc.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: [ 10/57] bcache: Fix for handling overlapping extents when reading in a btree node

3.11-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Kent Overstreet <kmo@...erainc.com>

commit 84786438ed17978d72eeced580ab757e4da8830b upstream.

btree_sort_fixup() was overly clever, because it was trying to avoid
pulling a key off the btree iterator in more than one place.

This led to a really obscure bug where we'd break early from the loop in
btree_sort_fixup() if the current key overlapped with keys in more than
one older set, and the next key it overlapped with was zero size.

Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kmo@...erainc.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/md/bcache/bset.c |   39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/md/bcache/bset.c
+++ b/drivers/md/bcache/bset.c
@@ -926,28 +926,45 @@ struct bkey *bch_next_recurse_key(struct
 
 /* Mergesort */
 
+static void sort_key_next(struct btree_iter *iter,
+			  struct btree_iter_set *i)
+{
+	i->k = bkey_next(i->k);
+
+	if (i->k == i->end)
+		*i = iter->data[--iter->used];
+}
+
 static void btree_sort_fixup(struct btree_iter *iter)
 {
 	while (iter->used > 1) {
 		struct btree_iter_set *top = iter->data, *i = top + 1;
-		struct bkey *k;
 
 		if (iter->used > 2 &&
 		    btree_iter_cmp(i[0], i[1]))
 			i++;
 
-		for (k = i->k;
-		     k != i->end && bkey_cmp(top->k, &START_KEY(k)) > 0;
-		     k = bkey_next(k))
-			if (top->k > i->k)
-				__bch_cut_front(top->k, k);
-			else if (KEY_SIZE(k))
-				bch_cut_back(&START_KEY(k), top->k);
-
-		if (top->k < i->k || k == i->k)
+		if (bkey_cmp(top->k, &START_KEY(i->k)) <= 0)
 			break;
 
-		heap_sift(iter, i - top, btree_iter_cmp);
+		if (!KEY_SIZE(i->k)) {
+			sort_key_next(iter, i);
+			heap_sift(iter, i - top, btree_iter_cmp);
+			continue;
+		}
+
+		if (top->k > i->k) {
+			if (bkey_cmp(top->k, i->k) >= 0)
+				sort_key_next(iter, i);
+			else
+				bch_cut_front(top->k, i->k);
+
+			heap_sift(iter, i - top, btree_iter_cmp);
+		} else {
+			/* can't happen because of comparison func */
+			BUG_ON(!bkey_cmp(&START_KEY(top->k), &START_KEY(i->k)));
+			bch_cut_back(&START_KEY(i->k), top->k);
+		}
 	}
 }
 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/