[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1380774230.19002.135.camel@edumazet-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2013 21:23:50 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Xi Wang <xi.wang@...il.com>, x86@...nel.org,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] fix unsafe set_memory_rw from softirq
On Wed, 2013-10-02 at 20:50 -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> on x86 system with net.core.bpf_jit_enable = 1
> diff --git a/include/linux/filter.h b/include/linux/filter.h
> index a6ac848..378fa03 100644
> --- a/include/linux/filter.h
> +++ b/include/linux/filter.h
> @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ struct sk_filter
> unsigned int len; /* Number of filter blocks */
> unsigned int (*bpf_func)(const struct sk_buff *skb,
> const struct sock_filter *filter);
> + struct work_struct work;
> struct rcu_head rcu;
> struct sock_filter insns[0];
> };
Nice catch !
It seems only x86 and s390 needs this work_struct.
(and you might CC Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com> to ask him
to make the s390 part, of Ack it if you plan to do it)
Thanks
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists