[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131003010230.GN6768@jonmason-lab>
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2013 18:02:30 -0700
From: Jon Mason <jon.mason@...el.com>
To: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
Michael Ellerman <michael@...erman.id.au>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Andy King <acking@...are.com>,
Matt Porter <mporter@...nel.crashing.org>,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-mips@...ux-mips.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux390@...ibm.com,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, iss_storagedev@...com,
linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-driver@...gic.com,
Solarflare linux maintainers <linux-net-drivers@...arflare.com>,
"VMware, Inc." <pv-drivers@...are.com>, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 55/77] ntb: Update MSI/MSI-X interrupts enablement
code
On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 12:49:11PM +0200, Alexander Gordeev wrote:
> As result of recent re-design of the MSI/MSI-X interrupts enabling
> pattern this driver has to be updated to use the new technique to
> obtain a optimal number of MSI/MSI-X interrupts required.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...hat.com>
> ---
> drivers/ntb/ntb_hw.c | 41 +++++++++++++----------------------------
> drivers/ntb/ntb_hw.h | 2 --
> 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/ntb/ntb_hw.c b/drivers/ntb/ntb_hw.c
> index eccd5e5..7776429 100644
> --- a/drivers/ntb/ntb_hw.c
> +++ b/drivers/ntb/ntb_hw.c
> @@ -1032,23 +1032,26 @@ static int ntb_setup_msix(struct ntb_device *ndev)
> struct msix_entry *msix;
> int msix_entries;
> int rc, i;
> - u16 val;
>
> - if (!pdev->msix_cap) {
> - rc = -EIO;
> + rc = pci_msix_table_size(pdev);
> + if (rc < 0)
> goto err;
> - }
>
> - rc = pci_read_config_word(pdev, pdev->msix_cap + PCI_MSIX_FLAGS, &val);
> - if (rc)
> + /*
> + * On SNB, the link interrupt is always tied to 4th vector. If
> + * we can't get all 4, then we can't use MSI-X.
> + */
> + if ((rc < SNB_MSIX_CNT) && (ndev->hw_type != BWD_HW)) {
Please check for the HW type first, and then compare to
ndev->limits.msix_cnt (which will be SNB_MSIX_CNT on SNB HW). Also,
put the comment inside the if statement and remove the unecessary "()"
around the comparisons. OCD on my part, but I like it that way.
> + rc = -ENOSPC;
> goto err;
> -
> - msix_entries = msix_table_size(val);
> - if (msix_entries > ndev->limits.msix_cnt) {
> + }
else if...
> + if (rc > ndev->limits.msix_cnt) {
> rc = -EINVAL;
> goto err;
> }
>
> + msix_entries = rc;
> +
> ndev->msix_entries = kmalloc(sizeof(struct msix_entry) * msix_entries,
> GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!ndev->msix_entries) {
> @@ -1060,26 +1063,8 @@ static int ntb_setup_msix(struct ntb_device *ndev)
> ndev->msix_entries[i].entry = i;
>
> rc = pci_enable_msix(pdev, ndev->msix_entries, msix_entries);
> - if (rc < 0)
> + if (rc)
> goto err1;
> - if (rc > 0) {
> - /* On SNB, the link interrupt is always tied to 4th vector. If
> - * we can't get all 4, then we can't use MSI-X.
> - */
> - if ((rc < SNB_MSIX_CNT) && (ndev->hw_type != BWD_HW)) {
> - rc = -EIO;
> - goto err1;
> - }
> -
> - dev_warn(&pdev->dev,
> - "Only %d MSI-X vectors. Limiting the number of queues to that number.\n",
> - rc);
> - msix_entries = rc;
> -
> - rc = pci_enable_msix(pdev, ndev->msix_entries, msix_entries);
> - if (rc)
> - goto err1;
> - }
>
> for (i = 0; i < msix_entries; i++) {
> msix = &ndev->msix_entries[i];
> diff --git a/drivers/ntb/ntb_hw.h b/drivers/ntb/ntb_hw.h
> index 0a31ced..50bd760 100644
> --- a/drivers/ntb/ntb_hw.h
> +++ b/drivers/ntb/ntb_hw.h
> @@ -60,8 +60,6 @@
> #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_NTB_SS_HSX 0x2F0F
> #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_NTB_B2B_BWD 0x0C4E
>
> -#define msix_table_size(control) ((control & PCI_MSIX_FLAGS_QSIZE)+1)
Good riddance! :-)
> -
> #ifndef readq
> static inline u64 readq(void __iomem *addr)
> {
> --
> 1.7.7.6
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists