[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <524CCF38.9000304@zytor.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2013 18:58:16 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
CC: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
viro@...IV.linux.org.uk, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
hch@...radead.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, dhowells@...hat.com,
zab@...hat.com, jack@...e.cz, tytso@....edu, mszeredi@...e.cz
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/7] cross rename
On 10/01/2013 09:00 AM, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> This series adds a new syscall, renameat2(), which is the same as renameat() but
> with a flags argument. Internally i_op->reaname2() is also added, which can
> later be merged with ->rename() but is kept separately for now, since this would
> just blow up this patch without helping review.
>
> The purpose of extending rename is to add cross-rename, a symmetric variant of
> rename, which exchanges the two files. This allows interesting things, which
> were not possible before, for example atomically replacing a directory tree with
> a symlink, etc...
>
I would suggest it shouldn't be renameat2() but rather renameat3(), i.e.
rename file A -> B, if B exists rename B to C. It may not be desirable
to expose the stale B in the same namespace as A, but still want it to
be possible to scavenge it. Obviously, A=C is a valid subcase.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists