lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131003070426.GA5320@gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 3 Oct 2013 09:04:26 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To:	Mike Travis <travis@....com>
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
	Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...driver.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@....com>,
	Hedi Berriche <hedi@....com>, x86@...nel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] KGDB/KDB: add support for external NMI handler to
 call KGDB/KDB.


* Mike Travis <travis@....com> wrote:

> This patch adds a kgdb_nmicallin() interface that can be used by
> external NMI handlers to call the KGDB/KDB handler.  The primary need
> for this is for those types of NMI interrupts where all the CPUs
> have already received the NMI signal.  Therefore no send_IPI(NMI)
> is required, and in fact it will cause a 2nd unhandled NMI to occur.
> This generates the "Dazed and Confuzed" messages.
> 
> Since all the CPUs are getting the NMI at roughly the same time, it's not
> guaranteed that the first CPU that hits the NMI handler will manage to
> enter KGDB and set the dbg_master_lock before the slaves start entering.
> The new argument "send_ready" was added for KGDB to signal the NMI handler
> to release the slave CPUs for entry into KGDB.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mike Travis <travis@....com>
> Reviewed-by: Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@....com>
> Reviewed-by: Hedi Berriche <hedi@....com>
> Acked-by: Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...driver.com>
> ---
> v3: make entry into SYSTEM_NMI section more specific
> ---
>  include/linux/kdb.h             |    1 +
>  include/linux/kgdb.h            |    1 +
>  kernel/debug/debug_core.c       |   30 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  kernel/debug/debug_core.h       |    1 +
>  kernel/debug/kdb/kdb_debugger.c |    5 ++++-
>  kernel/debug/kdb/kdb_main.c     |    3 +++
>  6 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> --- linux.orig/include/linux/kdb.h
> +++ linux/include/linux/kdb.h
> @@ -109,6 +109,7 @@ typedef enum {
>  	KDB_REASON_RECURSE,	/* Recursive entry to kdb;
>  				 * regs probably valid */
>  	KDB_REASON_SSTEP,	/* Single Step trap. - regs valid */
> +	KDB_REASON_SYSTEM_NMI,	/* In NMI due to SYSTEM cmd; regs valid */
>  } kdb_reason_t;

Note that this is within an #ifdef CONFIG_KGDB_KDB section.

> --- linux.orig/kernel/debug/debug_core.c
> +++ linux/kernel/debug/debug_core.c
> @@ -575,8 +575,12 @@ return_normal:
>  		raw_spin_lock(&dbg_slave_lock);
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> +	/* If SYSTEM_NMI, slaves are already waiting */
> +	if (ks->err_code == KDB_REASON_SYSTEM_NMI)
> +		atomic_set(ks->send_ready, 1);

And this then fails to build if CONFIG_KGDB_KDB is turned off:

kernel/debug/debug_core.c:579:22: error: ‘KDB_REASON_SYSTEM_NMI’ undeclared (first use in this function)
kernel/debug/debug_core.c:753:19: error: ‘KDB_REASON_SYSTEM_NMI’ undeclared (first use in this function)

More fundamentally, I think the way KDB internals added to debug_core.c by 
this patch violates its relatively layered design.

It would be cleaner to add helper functions defined in kdb and turned into 
empty inlines in the !CONFIG_KGDB_KDB case, like it's done for a couple of 
other cases in kdb.h:

static inline void kdb_init(int level) {}
static inline int kdb_register(char *cmd, kdb_func_t func, char *usage,
                               char *help, short minlen) { return 0; }
static inline int kdb_register_repeat(char *cmd, kdb_func_t func, char *usage,
                                      char *help, short minlen,
                                      kdb_repeat_t repeat) { return 0; }
static inline int kdb_unregister(char *cmd) { return 0; }

So this needs more work.

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ