[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABPqkBQ5zEwcUHRBSAx6MPSamen9XjV3MoVPmCjaqCTL-DjO1Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2013 11:13:57 +0200
From: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"mingo@...e.hu" <mingo@...e.hu>,
"ak@...ux.intel.com" <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] perf: mmap2 not covering VM_CLONE regions
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 11:03 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 10:55:28AM +0200, Stephane Eranian wrote:
>> I don't know the MM code but I assume that that vm_mm struct is
>> allocated dynamically
>> and maybe you already grabbing a lock while doing this. Could we
>> leverage that lock
>> to increment a global generation number?
>
> Sure; something like so.. I just don't like global state nor adding to
> mm_struct for just this.
>
I understand, I don't like global state either. I see you already
have uprobes state in there. Thus to me, the perf situation is
not much worse in terms of usefulness (frequency of use).
Thanks.
> ---
> include/linux/mm_types.h | 1 +
> kernel/fork.c | 6 ++++++
> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/mm_types.h b/include/linux/mm_types.h
> index d9851eeb6e1d..3877b1e72a5b 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mm_types.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mm_types.h
> @@ -436,6 +436,7 @@ struct mm_struct {
> int first_nid;
> #endif
> struct uprobes_state uprobes_state;
> + u64 mm_id;
> };
>
> /* first nid will either be a valid NID or one of these values */
> diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
> index 086fe73ad6bd..b315f6227629 100644
> --- a/kernel/fork.c
> +++ b/kernel/fork.c
> @@ -523,6 +523,8 @@ static void mm_init_aio(struct mm_struct *mm)
> #endif
> }
>
> +static u64 global_mm_id;
> +
> static struct mm_struct *mm_init(struct mm_struct *mm, struct task_struct *p)
> {
> atomic_set(&mm->mm_users, 1);
> @@ -537,6 +539,7 @@ static struct mm_struct *mm_init(struct mm_struct *mm, struct task_struct *p)
> spin_lock_init(&mm->page_table_lock);
> mm_init_aio(mm);
> mm_init_owner(mm, p);
> + mm->mm_id = 0;
>
> if (likely(!mm_alloc_pgd(mm))) {
> mm->def_flags = 0;
> @@ -1422,6 +1425,9 @@ static struct task_struct *copy_process(unsigned long clone_flags,
> */
> write_lock_irq(&tasklist_lock);
>
> + if (p->mm && !p->mm->mm_id)
> + p->mm->mm_id = ++global_mm_id;
> +
> /* CLONE_PARENT re-uses the old parent */
> if (clone_flags & (CLONE_PARENT|CLONE_THREAD)) {
> p->real_parent = current->real_parent;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists