linux-kernel - Use of drivers/platform and matching include?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <BC1C47B3-5412-4829-A1D9-AAB04694D1CC@codeaurora.org>
Date:	Thu, 3 Oct 2013 09:45:38 -0500
From:	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>
To:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:	Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Use of drivers/platform and matching include?

As we look at upstreaming more support for the Qualcomm MSM SoCs there are a number of drivers or library like routines that are unique to the MSM platform, we are thinking that putting them under:

drivers/platform/qcom/

would make sense.  In addition there are headers that might need to get shared with drivers in other locations so I wanted to see what the take was on introducing:

include/linux/platform/qcom/

An example driver would be the means we utilize to communicate memory regions between various HW blocks on the SoC.  So a video/media core driver might need access to a header/functions from the memory region driver.

- k

-- 
Employee of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/