[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1380816035.27358.447.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2013 19:00:35 +0300
From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>
To: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
Cc: richard.genoud@...il.com, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] UBI: fix refill_wl_user_pool()
On Thu, 2013-10-03 at 17:53 +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Am 03.10.2013 17:27, schrieb Artem Bityutskiy:
> > On Thu, 2013-10-03 at 17:08 +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> >> Am 03.10.2013 17:00, schrieb Artem Bityutskiy:
> >>> On Sat, 2013-09-28 at 15:55 +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> >>>> If no free PEBs are available refill_wl_user_pool() must not
> >>>> return with -ENOSPC immediately.
> >>>> It has to block till produce_free_peb() produced a free PEB.
> >>>>
> >>>> Reported-and-Tested-by: Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@...il.com>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
> >>>
> >>> What is pool size, I wonder?
> >>
> >> Currently it's 25 (UBI_FM_WL_POOL_SIZE).
> >> If experience shows that 25 is too low/big we can change this constant.
> >> Maybe it's also worth making them configurable...
> >
> > I if it is a possible scenario that this function will not return until
> > 25 (or even 10) PEBs are erased?
> >
>
> Sure. It will try to gain up to 25 PEBs but return if it gets less.
> That's why a pool has a current and a max size.
So if erasing speed is say, 250ms, then it would take 6.25 seconds?
--
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists