| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20131003162519.GA25042@kroah.com> Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2013 09:25:19 -0700 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> To: Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org> Cc: Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org Subject: Re: Use of drivers/platform and matching include? On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 11:21:10AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote: > > On Oct 3, 2013, at 10:27 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 09:45:38AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote: > >> As we look at upstreaming more support for the Qualcomm MSM SoCs there > >> are a number of drivers or library like routines that are unique to > >> the MSM platform, we are thinking that putting them under: > >> > >> drivers/platform/qcom/ > > > > What type of drivers are these? Shouldn't they really go under the > > specific driver type directory instead? > > If there isn't an existing driver/ dir for this I dont see how it can go there, I'm not also not really a fan of trying to artificial put something that is highly SoC specific into something generic of this nature. Loose a line-wrap somewhere?... Anyway, you didn't answer my question, so why do I need to answer yours? snarkily, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists