[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <524DA6F9.9000608@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2013 11:18:49 -0600
From: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>
CC: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf tool: more user-friendly errors from trace
On 10/3/13 10:58 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 01:58:11PM +0530, Ramkumar Ramachandra escreveu:
>> Currently, execution of 'perf trace' reports the following cryptic
>> message to the user:
>>
>> $ perf trace
>> Couldn't read the raw_syscalls tracepoints information!
>>
>> Now, it prints a detailed message:
>
> What about the one attached instead? It
Isnt' strerror(errno) preferred over sys_errlist[errno]?
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists