[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131003184607.GQ5790@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2013 11:46:07 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] hotplug: Optimize cpu_hotplug_{begin,done}() using
rcu_sync
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 08:41:51PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 09:48:38AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > -enum { readers_fast = 0, readers_slow, readers_block };
> > > +enum { readers_slow, readers_block };
> >
> > It took me a bit to realize that readers_fast is obsoleted by the
> > rcu_sync_is_idle() above. ;-)
>
> Yeah.. I pondered changing/adding to the rcu_sync interface to allow
> using gp_count like status to avoid the extra variable, but decided
> against it for now.
Should be OK as is -- people who haven't reviewed the old version with
readers_fast are unlikely to be confused by the current setup.
Thanx, Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists