| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20131003190830.GA18672@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2013 15:08:30 -0400
From: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
To: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
peter@...leysoftware.com
Subject: tty/perf lockdep trace.
======================================================
[ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
3.12.0-rc3+ #92 Not tainted
-------------------------------------------------------
trinity-child2/15191 is trying to acquire lock:
(&rdp->nocb_wq){......}, at: [<ffffffff8108ff43>] __wake_up+0x23/0x50
but task is already holding lock:
(&ctx->lock){-.-...}, at: [<ffffffff81154c19>] perf_event_exit_task+0x109/0x230
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #3 (&ctx->lock){-.-...}:
[<ffffffff810cc243>] lock_acquire+0x93/0x200
[<ffffffff81733f90>] _raw_spin_lock+0x40/0x80
[<ffffffff811500ff>] __perf_event_task_sched_out+0x2df/0x5e0
[<ffffffff81091b83>] perf_event_task_sched_out+0x93/0xa0
[<ffffffff81732052>] __schedule+0x1d2/0xa20
[<ffffffff81732f30>] preempt_schedule_irq+0x50/0xb0
[<ffffffff817352b6>] retint_kernel+0x26/0x30
[<ffffffff813eed04>] tty_flip_buffer_push+0x34/0x50
[<ffffffff813f0504>] pty_write+0x54/0x60
[<ffffffff813e900d>] n_tty_write+0x32d/0x4e0
[<ffffffff813e5838>] tty_write+0x158/0x2d0
[<ffffffff811c4850>] vfs_write+0xc0/0x1f0
[<ffffffff811c52cc>] SyS_write+0x4c/0xa0
[<ffffffff8173d4e4>] tracesys+0xdd/0xe2
-> #2 (&rq->lock){-.-.-.}:
[<ffffffff810cc243>] lock_acquire+0x93/0x200
[<ffffffff81733f90>] _raw_spin_lock+0x40/0x80
[<ffffffff810980b2>] wake_up_new_task+0xc2/0x2e0
[<ffffffff81054336>] do_fork+0x126/0x460
[<ffffffff81054696>] kernel_thread+0x26/0x30
[<ffffffff8171ff93>] rest_init+0x23/0x140
[<ffffffff81ee1e4b>] start_kernel+0x3f6/0x403
[<ffffffff81ee1571>] x86_64_start_reservations+0x2a/0x2c
[<ffffffff81ee1664>] x86_64_start_kernel+0xf1/0xf4
-> #1 (&p->pi_lock){-.-.-.}:
[<ffffffff810cc243>] lock_acquire+0x93/0x200
[<ffffffff8173419b>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x4b/0x90
[<ffffffff810979d1>] try_to_wake_up+0x31/0x350
[<ffffffff81097d62>] default_wake_function+0x12/0x20
[<ffffffff81084af8>] autoremove_wake_function+0x18/0x40
[<ffffffff8108ea38>] __wake_up_common+0x58/0x90
[<ffffffff8108ff59>] __wake_up+0x39/0x50
[<ffffffff8110d4f8>] __call_rcu_nocb_enqueue+0xa8/0xc0
[<ffffffff81111450>] __call_rcu+0x140/0x820
[<ffffffff81111b8d>] call_rcu+0x1d/0x20
[<ffffffff81093697>] cpu_attach_domain+0x287/0x360
[<ffffffff81099d7e>] build_sched_domains+0xe5e/0x10a0
[<ffffffff81efa7fc>] sched_init_smp+0x3b7/0x47a
[<ffffffff81ee1f4e>] kernel_init_freeable+0xf6/0x202
[<ffffffff817200be>] kernel_init+0xe/0x190
[<ffffffff8173d22c>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0
-> #0 (&rdp->nocb_wq){......}:
[<ffffffff810cb7ca>] __lock_acquire+0x191a/0x1be0
[<ffffffff810cc243>] lock_acquire+0x93/0x200
[<ffffffff8173419b>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x4b/0x90
[<ffffffff8108ff43>] __wake_up+0x23/0x50
[<ffffffff8110d4f8>] __call_rcu_nocb_enqueue+0xa8/0xc0
[<ffffffff81111450>] __call_rcu+0x140/0x820
[<ffffffff81111bb0>] kfree_call_rcu+0x20/0x30
[<ffffffff81149abf>] put_ctx+0x4f/0x70
[<ffffffff81154c3e>] perf_event_exit_task+0x12e/0x230
[<ffffffff81056b8d>] do_exit+0x30d/0xcc0
[<ffffffff8105893c>] do_group_exit+0x4c/0xc0
[<ffffffff810589c4>] SyS_exit_group+0x14/0x20
[<ffffffff8173d4e4>] tracesys+0xdd/0xe2
other info that might help us debug this:
Chain exists of:
&rdp->nocb_wq --> &rq->lock --> &ctx->lock
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(&ctx->lock);
lock(&rq->lock);
lock(&ctx->lock);
lock(&rdp->nocb_wq);
*** DEADLOCK ***
1 lock held by trinity-child2/15191:
#0: (&ctx->lock){-.-...}, at: [<ffffffff81154c19>] perf_event_exit_task+0x109/0x230
stack backtrace:
CPU: 2 PID: 15191 Comm: trinity-child2 Not tainted 3.12.0-rc3+ #92
ffffffff82565b70 ffff880070c2dbf8 ffffffff8172a363 ffffffff824edf40
ffff880070c2dc38 ffffffff81726741 ffff880070c2dc90 ffff88022383b1c0
ffff88022383aac0 0000000000000000 ffff88022383b188 ffff88022383b1c0
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff8172a363>] dump_stack+0x4e/0x82
[<ffffffff81726741>] print_circular_bug+0x200/0x20f
[<ffffffff810cb7ca>] __lock_acquire+0x191a/0x1be0
[<ffffffff810c6439>] ? get_lock_stats+0x19/0x60
[<ffffffff8100b2f4>] ? native_sched_clock+0x24/0x80
[<ffffffff810cc243>] lock_acquire+0x93/0x200
[<ffffffff8108ff43>] ? __wake_up+0x23/0x50
[<ffffffff8173419b>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x4b/0x90
[<ffffffff8108ff43>] ? __wake_up+0x23/0x50
[<ffffffff8108ff43>] __wake_up+0x23/0x50
[<ffffffff8110d4f8>] __call_rcu_nocb_enqueue+0xa8/0xc0
[<ffffffff81111450>] __call_rcu+0x140/0x820
[<ffffffff8109bc8f>] ? local_clock+0x3f/0x50
[<ffffffff81111bb0>] kfree_call_rcu+0x20/0x30
[<ffffffff81149abf>] put_ctx+0x4f/0x70
[<ffffffff81154c3e>] perf_event_exit_task+0x12e/0x230
[<ffffffff81056b8d>] do_exit+0x30d/0xcc0
[<ffffffff810c9af5>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x115/0x1e0
[<ffffffff810c9bcd>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0x10
[<ffffffff8105893c>] do_group_exit+0x4c/0xc0
[<ffffffff810589c4>] SyS_exit_group+0x14/0x20
[<ffffffff8173d4e4>] tracesys+0xdd/0xe2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists