[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131003200002.GA23768@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2013 22:00:02 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] rcu: Create rcu_sync infrastructure
On 10/03, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 09:33:19PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > On 10/03, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > >
> > > Because I believe this needs another patch ;) see below, didn't test
> > > it yet.
> > > ...
> > > struct rcu_sync_ops {
> > > void (*sync)(void);
> > > void (*call)(struct rcu_head *, void (*)(struct rcu_head *));
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_RCU
> > > + bool (*held)(void);
> > ^^^^
> > OK, it has to return "int".
>
> I missed this, but the rest looked good. ;-)
OK thanks ;)
So unless Peter objects I'll write the changelogs (always nontrivial task),
test, and send these 2 patches + "add ops->barr() / rcu_sync_wait_for_cb"
tomorrow.
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists