[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <524DD034.30906@nvidia.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2013 13:14:44 -0700
From: Paul Walmsley <pwalmsley@...dia.com>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
CC: "rjw@...k.pl" <rjw@...k.pl>,
"daniel.lezcano@...aro.org" <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
"linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org" <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
"patches@...aro.org" <patches@...aro.org>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 03/16] cpuidle: make __cpuidle_get_cpu_driver() inline
Hi
a comment on this one (and any similar patch)
On 10/03/2013 08:56 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> __cpuidle_get_cpu_driver() is a single line function and so deserves to be
> marked inline.
In general, this is a violation of Documentation/CodingStyle - see
Chapter 15.
Unless this produces a significant benefit, it's probably best to just
let the compiler do this if it wants.
- Paul
> Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
> ---
> drivers/cpuidle/driver.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/driver.c b/drivers/cpuidle/driver.c
> index ced1df6..25455e8 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpuidle/driver.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/driver.c
> @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct cpuidle_driver *, cpuidle_drivers);
> * Returns a pointer to struct cpuidle_driver or NULL if no driver has been
> * registered for @cpu.
> */
> -static struct cpuidle_driver *__cpuidle_get_cpu_driver(int cpu)
> +static inline struct cpuidle_driver *__cpuidle_get_cpu_driver(int cpu)
> {
> return per_cpu(cpuidle_drivers, cpu);
> }
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists