linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] conditionally reschedule while loading selinux policy.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2297933.rECKfqAcWT@sifl>
Date:	Thu, 03 Oct 2013 16:36:10 -0400
From:	Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
To:	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
Cc:	Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, eparis@...hat.com,
	james.l.morris@...cle.com, selinux@...ho.nsa.gov
Subject: Re: [PATCH] conditionally reschedule while loading selinux policy.

On Monday, September 30, 2013 05:13:42 PM Dave Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 01:37:53PM -0400, Stephen Smalley wrote:
>  > > With that patch applied, the problem seems to have moved elsewhere..
>  > > 
>  > > BUG: soft lockup - CPU#3 stuck for 22s! [load_policy:8119]
>  > > 
>  > >  irq event stamp: 1590886
>  > >  hardirqs last  enabled at (1590885): [<ffffffff8152c3dd>]
>  > >  __slab_alloc.constprop.78+0x4c0/0x4d7 hardirqs last disabled at
>  > >  (1590886): [<ffffffff8153e06a>] apic_timer_interrupt+0x6a/0x80
>  > >  softirqs last  enabled at (1590336): [<ffffffff810480d9>]
>  > >  __do_softirq+0x169/0x200 softirqs last disabled at (1590331):
>  > >  [<ffffffff8104839d>] irq_exit+0x11d/0x140 RIP:
>  > >  0010:[<ffffffff81223182>]  [<ffffffff81223182>]
>  > >  hashtab_insert+0x62/0x110 > > 
>  > > Call Trace:
>  > >  [<ffffffff812283b5>] policydb_read+0xc25/0x1200
>  > 
>  > ...
>  > 
>  > > We're holding a bunch of locks here, so we can't just cond_resched. 
>  > > Thoughts ?
>  >
>  > Sorry, what locks are we holding there?  You ought to be able to do a
>  > cond_resched() anywhere during policydb_read() AFAIK; it is loading the
>  > policy into a new structure that isn't being accessed by anything else
>  > yet and the policy_rwlock is only held by security_load_policy after
>  > calling policydb_read and only to switch it into place as the active
>  > policydb.
> 
> Hmm, I thought I had tried this already, and got a lot of spew, but it turns
> out for some reason I had previously patched hashtab_search instead.
> 
> I'll try running with this for a while..

Hi Dave,

Just checking to see if this patch solved your problem ... ?

> diff --git a/security/selinux/ss/hashtab.c b/security/selinux/ss/hashtab.c
> index 933e735..2cc4961 100644
> --- a/security/selinux/ss/hashtab.c
> +++ b/security/selinux/ss/hashtab.c
> @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
>  #include <linux/kernel.h>
>  #include <linux/slab.h>
>  #include <linux/errno.h>
> +#include <linux/sched.h>
>  #include "hashtab.h"
> 
>  struct hashtab *hashtab_create(u32 (*hash_value)(struct hashtab *h, const
> void *key), @@ -40,6 +41,8 @@ int hashtab_insert(struct hashtab *h, void
> *key, void *datum) u32 hvalue;
>  	struct hashtab_node *prev, *cur, *newnode;
> 
> +	cond_resched();
> +
>  	if (!h || h->nel == HASHTAB_MAX_NODES)
>  		return -EINVAL;

-- 
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/